Research Article

Noninvasive Biophysical Monitoring of Vascular Complications in Hemodialysis Using ECG and Bilateral PPG Measurements

Nguyen-Ngan-Ha Lam 1, Ming-Jui Wu 2 3, Fang-Yi Su 1, Wei-Siang Ciou 1, Yi-Chun Du 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, 701, Tainan, Taiwan2 College of Pharmacy & Health Care, Tajen University, Pingtung County 90741, Taiwan3 Taiwan and Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Tainan Branch , Tainan 710, Taiwan* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Clinical Medicine and Bioengineering, 4(2), 2024, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.35745/ijcmb2024v04.02.0001
Published: 02 April 2025
OPEN ACCESS   453 Views   2 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition affecting millions worldwide, with a rising prevalence among younger populations due to lifestyle and genetic factors. In end-stage renal disease (ESRD), hemodialysis (HD) using an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is essential for blood filtration. However, AVF stenosis, often caused by intimal hyperplasia, can lead to thrombosis and vascular dysfunction, requiring continuous monitoring to prevent complications. Despite the critical need for early detection, there are currently no home-based devices for assessing the degree of stenosis (DOS). To address this gap, this study proposes a wearable device and mobile application for non-invasive DOS assessment. The system collects electrocardiogram (ECG) and bilateral photoplethysmography (PPG) signals to calculate pulse transit time (PTT) differences, which correlate with stenosis severity. The results demonstrated a strong correlation (R² = 0.89) between PTT delay and DOS, confirming the feasibility of using this approach for stenosis detection. By enabling real-time, home-based monitoring, the proposed solution offers a new approach for early detection and prevention of AVF-related complications. The results demonstrate the algorithm’s potential for accurate DOS evaluation, providing a significant advancement in home-based AVF management for hemodialysis patients.

CITATION (APA)

Lam, N.-N.-H., Wu, M.-J., Su, F.-Y., Ciou, W.-S., & Du, Y.-C. (2024). Noninvasive Biophysical Monitoring of Vascular Complications in Hemodialysis Using ECG and Bilateral PPG Measurements. International Journal of Clinical Medicine and Bioengineering, 4(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.35745/ijcmb2024v04.02.0001

REFERENCES

  1. Webster, A.C.; Nagler, E.V.; Morton, R.L.; Masson, P. Chronic Kidney Disease. Lancet 2017, 389, 1238–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32064-5.
  2. Bello, A.K.; et al. Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2022, 18, 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-022-00542-7.
  3. Tsai, S.Y.; Tseng, H.F.; Tan, H.F.; Chien, Y.S.; Chang, C.C. End-stage renal disease in Taiwan: A case-control study. J Epidemiol 2009, 19, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20080099.
  4. Lee, H.; Baek, G.; Lee, E. Effects of an arteriovenous fistula stenosis prevention program in patients receiving hemodialysis. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2023, 14, 279–290. https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0101.
  5. Li, J.; Lu, H.; Xie, Z.; Li, Q.; Shi, H. Outcomes of arteriovenous graft vs. fistula for haemodialysis access in the elderly: A systematic review and meta analysis. Exp Ther Med 2023, 26, 12098. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12098.
  6. MacRae, J.M.; et al. Arteriovenous access failure, stenosis, and thrombosis. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2016, 3, 2054358116669126. https://doi.org/10.1177/2054358116669126.
  7. Chiang, P.Y.; et al. Machine learning classification for assessing the degree of stenosis and blood flow volume at arteriovenous fistulas of hemodialysis patients using a new photoplethysmography sensor device. Sensors 2019, 19, 3422. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19153422.
  8. Du, Y.C.; Stephanus, A. A novel classification technique of arteriovenous fistula stenosis evaluation using bilateral PPG analysis. Micromachines 2016, 7, 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi7090147.
  9. Du, Y.C.; Shih, J.B.; Wu, M.J.; Chiou, C.Y. Development of an AVF stenosis assessment tool for hemodialysis patients using robotic ultrasound system. Micromachines 2018, 9, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9020051.
  10. Song, W.T.; Chen, C.C.; Yu, Z.W.; Huang, H.C. An effective AI model for automatically detecting arteriovenous fistula stenosis. Sci Rep 2023, 13, 17659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35444-6.
  11. Jin, J.; Geng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ye, T. Pulse Wave Analysis Method of Cardiovascular Parameters Extraction for Health Monitoring. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023, 20, 2597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032597.
  12. Karimpour, P.; May, J.M.; Kyriacou, P.A. Photoplethysmography for the Assessment of Arterial Stiffness. Sensors 2023, 23, 9882. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23249882.
  13. Erts, R.; Spigulis, J.; Kukulis, I.; Ozols, M. Bilateral photoplethysmography studies of the leg arterial stenosis. Physiol Meas 2005, 26, 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/26/5/022.
  14. Tompkins, W.J. A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1985, BME-32, 230–236.
  15. Gutiérrez-Rivas, R.; García, J.J.; Marnane, W.P.; Hernández, Á. Novel Real-Time Low-Complexity QRS Complex Detector Based on Adaptive Thresholding. IEEE Sens J 2015, 15, 6036–6043. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2450773.
  16. Benitez, D.; Gaydecki, P.A.; Zaidi, A.; Fitzpatrick, A.P. The use of the Hilbert transform in ECG signal analysis. Comput. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 399–406.
  17. Esgalhado, F.; Batista, A.; Vassilenko, V.; Russo, S.; Ortigueira, M. Peak Detection and HRV Feature Evaluation on ECG and PPG Signals. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061139.
  18. van Velzen, M.H.N.; Loeve, A.J.; Niehof, S.P.; Mik, E.G. Increasing accuracy of pulse transit time measurements by automated elimination of distorted photoplethysmography waves. Med Biol Eng Comput 2017, 55, 1989–2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1642-x.
  19. Chen, M.; Chen, A.; Si, X.; Ji, M.; Zheng, D. Peripheral arterial volume distensibility changes with applied external pressure: Significant difference between arteries with different compliance. Sci Rep 2017, 7, 40545. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40545.